A Toast to the Error Detectors
Let 2020 be the year in which we value those who ensure that science is self-correcting.
Send us a link
Let 2020 be the year in which we value those who ensure that science is self-correcting.
How has peer review fared in the 2010s? We outline some key trends that have helped to define, challenge and progress the peer review system over the decade.
What we learned from the spy in your pocket.
The vaccine, developed by Merck, protects against Zaire ebolaviruses, the species of the virus that has been the most common cause of Ebola outbreaks.
Alan Cooper was dismissed as the leader of a prestigious genomics centre, following an investigation.
World's second-biggest publisher says proposals to accelerate switch to open access would not be sustainable for many titles
An analysis of submissions to two top journals showed that scientists in the U.S. were highly likely to be working during holidays.
The 2010s have seen breakthroughs in frontiers from gene editing to gravitational waves. The coming one must focus on climate change.
Articles in high-impact journals are by definition more highly cited on average. But are they cited more often because the articles are somehow "better"? Or are they cited more often simply because they appeared in a high-impact journal?
Navigating the turbulent waters of the doctoral voyage
Letters blast rumored shift to immediate open access for taxpayer-funded studies
Many scientific organizations struggle with teaching and incentivizing science-communication practices. Here's what they can do differently, says communication researcher Jessica Eise.
The findings mark a step forward in using space technology to detect leaks of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, from oil and gas sites worldwide.
NIH gets 7%, NSF only 2.5%, as Congress ignores Trump's proposed cuts.
Altmetric list of scholarship getting the most online attention shows that authenticity in science, and society more generally, is major theme of the year.
An opportunity for journals and publishers to take the bold step of changing their business model?
Do men and women differ in how positively they frame their research findings and is the positive framing of research is associated with higher downstream citations?
Ten people who mattered in science in 2019 according to nature.
The research that caught the public imagination in 2019.
Robert Harington explores rumors circulating in recent weeks of an impending US Executive Order focusing on public access to federally funded research and open data.
American pigs are raised on a liberal diet of antibiotics, fueling the rise of resistant germs. Danish pork producers are proving there's a better way.
Exhausted delegates postponed tricky issues. The weak rules on a market based mechanism, promoted by Brazil and Australia, that would have undermined efforts to reduce emissions have been shelved and the fight can continue next year at COP26 in Glasgow.
Economic and Social Research Council may provide four years of PhD funding amid concerns over stress caused by three-year model
Scientists use big data to understand what separates winners from losers
How will climate change shape the Earth's surface? What are the long-term health effects of food additives? How can online tools change political advocacy and what does this mean for democracy? These are just some of the questions that researchers from around Europe have proposed to explore, and will now be able to, thanks to newly-awarded EU funding.