Criticizing a Scientist’s Work Isn’t Bullying. It’s Science.
The New York Times Magazine story on Amy Cuddy brings up extremely important problems in science. But we cannot equate criticism with harassment.
Send us a link
The New York Times Magazine story on Amy Cuddy brings up extremely important problems in science. But we cannot equate criticism with harassment.
Why we need a public data infrastructure of publishing costs.
Ahmadreza Djalali, a researcher in disaster medicine, has 20 days to appeal against his death sentence.
Figshare's annual report shows that open data has become more embedded in the research community: 82% of survey respondents are aware of open data sets and more researchers are curating their data for sharing.
Hindawi’s CEO, Paul Peters, explains the problems inherent in proprietary solutions for Open Science infrastructure and presents a proposal for how things can be done differently.
Organizers of a Monday conference on the Narragansett Bay were told three E.P.A. scientists would not be allowed to present their work.
As a young social psychologist, she played by the rules and won big: an influential study, a viral TED talk, a prestigious job at Harvard. Then, suddenly, the rules changed.
In analyzing the marketplace of scholarly publishers and scientific workflow providers, a key strategic question is: Who owns Digital Science?
Federal spending on science has dropped by half in 5 years.
What can be done to preserve the monograph.
Repurposing continuous integration tools for scientific analyses takes the headache out of reproducible research.
How many scientists does it take to change the world?
Teaching scientists foundational computing skills.
Patreon works differently to most other crowdfunding services. On Patreon, you donate a small amount regularly.
Young firms struggle to compete as deep-pocketed companies like Facebook and Amazon clone products and consolidate their power.
Two scientists set out to animate how sperm moves. They ended up making a major discovery.
The threat to US science does not come from scientists' assumptions, their commitment to investigator-initiated research or the research community's failure to tackle problems of public concern. It comes from an unrealistic system of draconian budget caps that stifle investment in the future.
Canadian Science Publishing's Mary Seligy provides a primer on standards, XML and JATS4R, which is driving improved reusability of scholarly content.
Imagine a connected online web of scientific knowledge… tightly integrated with a scientific social web that directs scientists’ attention where it is most valuable, releasing enormous collaborative potential.
Taxpayers sometimes have to pay three times for any scientific article.
100+ volunteers sharing their knowledge about Open Science and contributing to what they see as an extremely important issue in nowadays and future science.
A European Commission working group recommends Horizon 2020 evaluation process to account for gender issues.