Send us a link
The pervasiveness and quality of data sharing policies in the biomedical literature.
A new report published today by Elsevier and CWTS provides a benchmark overview of data sharing perceptions and practices among researchers.
Springer Nature has developed a standardised, common framework for the research data policies of all its journals.
Because sharing underlying data is essential for accelerating scientific advances and maximizing the value of research.
Conflicts of interest can send a researcher's reputation crashing — but resolving them needn't be as burdensome as it seems.
Hundreds of researchers pick through clinical trial from a major blood-pressure study, to the dismay of some who collected the information.
Although researchers have relied on international resources such as the Protein Data Bank and Flybase for decades, the current system is unsustainable because it is largely funded by short-term grants.
Organs are not the only item of value from the deceased.
One Trump adviser suggested that NASA no longer should conduct climate research and instead should focus on space exploration.
Papers accepted for publication in Nature and an initial 12 other Nature titles will be required to include information on whether and how others can access the underlying data.
A systematic review of 98 scholarly papers and an empirical survey among 603 secondary data users develops a conceptual framework that explains the process of data sharing from the primary researcher’s point of view.
A survey of ~ 250 researchers across the sciences and social sciences asks what expectations “data publication” raises and what features would be useful to evaluate the trustworthiness, evaluate the impact, and enhance the prestige of a data publication.
