Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Scholarly Communications Shouldn't Just Be Open, but Non-Profit Too

Scholarly Communications Shouldn't Just Be Open, but Non-Profit Too

The profit motive is fundamentally misaligned with core values of academic life, potentially corroding ideals like unfettered inquiry, knowledge-sharing, and cooperative progress.

Who is Actually Harmed by Predatory Publishers?

Who is Actually Harmed by Predatory Publishers?

Established publishers have a strong motivation to hype claims of predation as damaging to the scholarly and scientific endeavour.

Could Publishing Embrace Slow?

Could Publishing Embrace Slow?

A recent book took aim at accelerating administrative demands and the internalized expectation of measurable productivity that have eroded the quality of academic life and work. Is there a corollary for scholarly publishing?

Elsevier Is Becoming a Data Company. Should Universities Be Wary?

Elsevier Is Becoming a Data Company. Should Universities Be Wary?

For years university researchers have complained that the publishing giant has driven up the costs of journals. Now, as data-sharing becomes more valuable, the company’s shifting focus is raising new concerns.

From Mandates to Platforms: Have Funders Lost Patience With Publishers?

From Mandates to Platforms: Have Funders Lost Patience With Publishers?

Publishing platforms from The Wellcome Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the European Commission alter Open Access.

Sci-Hub Provides Access to Nearly All Scholarly Literature

Sci-Hub Provides Access to Nearly All Scholarly Literature

Sci-Hub's contains 68.9% of all 81.6 million scholarly articles, which rises to 85.2% for those published in closed access journals and 77.0% of the 5.2 million articles published by inactive journals.

The Battle for Free Knowledge

The Battle for Free Knowledge

The issue regarding free access to academic journals and content is growing increasingly contentious, with founders of sites that enable this facing the might of the law. But should knowledge be exclusive?

Authorea and BioRxiv Partner to Bring Preprints into 21st Century

Authorea and BioRxiv Partner to Bring Preprints into 21st Century

Authorea, the collaborative document editor for researchers, announced a partnership and direct submission agreement with bioRxiv, the leading preprint server for biological research.

Science Has a Negativity Problem

Science Has a Negativity Problem

Exciting new discoveries get all the attention — leaving just-as-important negative results in the dust. And fixing the problem is easier said than done.

What Does the Future Hold for Academic Books?

What Does the Future Hold for Academic Books?

Between August 2014 and September 2016, the Academic Book of the Future Project, initiated by the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the British Library, explored the current and future status of the traditional academic monograph.

Bad Publishing and Bullied into Bad Science

Bad Publishing and Bullied into Bad Science

The recent long read about scientific publishing in the Guardian is fantastic. It depicts a very telling story of the research publishing landscape.