Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

A Guide to Applying the Good Publication Practice 3 Guidelines in the Asia-Pacific Region

A Guide to Applying the Good Publication Practice 3 Guidelines in the Asia-Pacific Region

Numerous recommendations and guidelines aim to improve the quality, timeliness and transparency of medical publications. However, these guidelines use ambiguous language that can be challenging to interpret, particularly for speakers of English as a second language. Cultural expectations within the Asia-Pacific region raise additional challenges and several studies have suggested that awareness and application of ethical publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region is relatively low compared with other regions. However, guidance on applying ethical publication practice guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region is lacking. This commentary aims to improve publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region by providing guidance on applying the 10 principles of the Good Publication Practice 3 (GPP3) guidelines and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship. Recommendations are provided for encore presentations, applying the ICMJE authorship criteria in the context of regional cultural expectations, and the role of study sponsors and professional medical writers. Ongoing barriers to compliance with guidelines are also highlighted, and additional guidance is provided to support authors submitting manuscripts for publication. The roles of regional journals, regulatory authorities and professional bodies in improving practices are also discussed.

Bipartisan Support for Scientific Integrity Reform is Growing

Bipartisan Support for Scientific Integrity Reform is Growing

"We are at a crisis point," according to a new report from the highly respected Brennan Center for Justice, "with almost weekly violations of previously respected safeguards."

Nature Walks Back Mentorship Prize for Spanish Scientist with Nine Retractions

Nature Walks Back Mentorship Prize for Spanish Scientist with Nine Retractions

Carlos Lopez-Otin Nature is rescinding an award to a Spanish researcher whose group has at least nine retractions for problems with their published images. 

Can You Spot the Duplicates? Critics Say These Photos of Lionfish Point to Fraud

Can You Spot the Duplicates? Critics Say These Photos of Lionfish Point to Fraud

The answer bears on whether a study about lionfish social behavior, published in Biology Letters in 2014, was fabricated.

The Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity

The Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity

The primary goal of research is to advance knowledge. For that knowledge to benefit research and society, it must be trustworthy. Trustworthy research is robust, rigorous and transparent at all stages of design, execution and reporting. The authors developed the Hong Kong Principles (HKP) with a specific focus on the need to drive research improvement through ensuring that researchers are explicitly recognized and rewarded for behavior that leads to trustworthy research. 

Journals' Instructions to Authors: A Cross-sectional Study Across Scientific Disciplines

Journals' Instructions to Authors: A Cross-sectional Study Across Scientific Disciplines

Study investigated 19 topics related to transparency in reporting and research integrity. Only three topics were addressed in more than one third of scientific journals' Instructions to Authors.

Journals Retract More Than a Dozen Studies from China That May Have Used Executed Prisoners' Organs

Journals Retract More Than a Dozen Studies from China That May Have Used Executed Prisoners' Organs

In the past month, PLOS ONE and Transplantation have retracted fifteen studies by authors in China because of suspicions that the authors may have used organs from executed prisoners.

Nutrition Science Is Broken. This New Egg Study Shows Why.

Nutrition Science Is Broken. This New Egg Study Shows Why.

At turns lauded and vilified, the humble egg is an example of everything wrong with nutrition studies.

Journals' Plagiarism Detectors May Flag Papers in Error

Journals' Plagiarism Detectors May Flag Papers in Error

One recent case, in which a scientist claims his submitted manuscript was rejected despite a lack of actual plagiarism, highlights the limitations of automated tools.

Hyped-up Science is a Problem. One Clever Twitter Account is Pushing Back.

Hyped-up Science is a Problem. One Clever Twitter Account is Pushing Back.

How a simple nudge can improve health and nutrition reporting. The Twitter account retweets science articles, adding “IN MICE.”

Plagiarism Detectors Are a Crutch, and a Problem

Plagiarism Detectors Are a Crutch, and a Problem

Academics and editors need to stop pretending that software always catches recycled text and start reading more carefully, says Debora Weber-Wulff.

Addressing Integrity Challenges in Research: the Institutional Dimension

Addressing Integrity Challenges in Research: the Institutional Dimension

Concern for and interest in research integrity has increased significantly during recent decades, both in academic and in policy discourse.

Plan to Replicate 50 High-Impact Cancer Papers Shrinks to Just 18

Plan to Replicate 50 High-Impact Cancer Papers Shrinks to Just 18

An ambitious project that set out nearly 5 years ago to replicate experiments from 50 high-impact cancer biology papers, but gradually shrank that number, now expects to complete just 18 studies.

The 'Loss of Confidence Project' Offers Scientists a Place to Confess

The 'Loss of Confidence Project' Offers Scientists a Place to Confess

What are researchers to do when they lose confidence in their previously published work? A new project has an answer. Will it help the replication crisis?