Five Better Ways to Assess Science
Hong Kong Principles seek to replace 'publish or perish' culture.
Send us a link
Hong Kong Principles seek to replace 'publish or perish' culture.
Via Wikimedia A journal has allowed a geophysicist who cited his own work hundreds of times across 10 papers to retract the articles and republish them with a fraction of the self-citations.
Nature has retracted a recent commentary after the author complained that he had been misled by the relationship of the publication to a financial sponsor and told to avoid critiquing work from the institution. The journal says it is revisiting its “editorial guidelines and processes” in the wake of the case.
Was there ever a golden age of unsullied science, as a book implies?
Personal integrity and local culture are key to research integrity, and bullying and harassment is the single biggest negative influence, according to a new study by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).
The now retracted paper halted hydroxychloroquine trials. Studies like this determine how people live or die tomorrow.
More than 120 researchers and medical professionals from around the world have written an open letter to the editor of the Lancet raising serious concerns about a large and widely publicised global study that prompted the World Health Organisation to halt several Covid-19 clinical trials.
Elisabeth Bik quit her job to spot errors in research papers - and has become the public face of image sleuthing.
Admitting scientific errors is hard. It's also important.
When science is viewed in isolation from the past and politics, it's easier for those with bad intentions to revive dangerous and discredited ideas.
Online sleuths have discovered what they suspect is a paper mill that has produced more than 400 scientific papers with potentially fabricated images. Some journals are now investigating the papers.
The virus doesn’t follow the news and doesn’t care about Twitter. This article proposes that reporting should distinguish between at least three levels of information reliability.
The authors of LERU's new paper on research integrity - Inge Lerouge and Ton Hol - discuss trust in science and how to earn it.
A tool that focuses on papers - not researcher behaviour - can help readers, editors and institutions assess which publications to trust.
The Mutual Learning Exercise (MLE) on Research Integrity, which forms the basis of this report, was carried out between July 2018 and June 2019 by a dedicated Policy Support Facility (PSF) panel consisting of four independent experts and twelve countries.
Universities worry about protecting privacy as they confront the growing problem of harrassment.
Image manipulation is nothing new, but its application for scientific and medical fraud is leaving lives and livelihoods at stake.
Democrats drop some provisions to gain Republican backing and improve chances of final passage of the scientific integrity bill.
Millions of Flickr images were sucked into a database called MegaFace. Now some of those faces may have the ability to sue.