Publish Peer Reviews
Jessica K. Polka and colleagues call on journals to sign a pledge to make reviewers’ anonymous comments part of the official scientific record.
Send us a link
Jessica K. Polka and colleagues call on journals to sign a pledge to make reviewers’ anonymous comments part of the official scientific record.
Working conditions in academic labs encourage abusive supervision. It is time to improve monitoring of and penalties for abuse, says Sherry Moss.
Researchers replicated 62% of social-behaviour findings published in Science and Nature - a result matched almost exactly by a prediction market.
British Heart Foundation award is one of the largest single grants in medical research.
Genetic analysis uncovers a direct descendant of two different groups of early humans.
Speakers inadvertently prepare presentations for themselves rather than their audiences. A few mental exercises can help presenters to avoid this pitfall.
Online technologies make it easy to share precise experimental protocols - and doing so is essential to modern science, says Lenny Teytelman.
Peer reviewers have the right to view the data and code that underlie a work if it would help in the evaluation, even if these have not been provided with the submission. Yet few referees exercise this right.
A simple software toolset can help to ease the pain of reproducing computational analyses.
Chris Ebell, who became director of the initiative in 2015, leaves after differences of opinion with the project’s lead institution.
The Wellcome Trust pulled the grant from Nazneen Rahman, who worked at the Institute of Cancer Research in London.
Unpaywall has become indispensable to many academics, and tie-ins with established scientific search engines could broaden its reach.
Smaller countries rely more on regional collaborations than on domestic interaction.
Choosing wisely from a burgeoning array of digital tools can help researchers to record experiments with ease.
I want to see whether the wisdom of crowds does a better job than conventional grant review at supporting research, says Johan Bollen.
Foreign faculty in Japan are less productive than their local counterparts on many measures, but better connected to global collaborations.
The US-based March of Dimes says it revoked awards to 37 researchers as part of a shift in its funding priorities.
Here's how PhD students can prepare for different careers, and how lab heads can help.
Who benefits from sharing data? The scientists of future do, as data sharing today enables new science tomorrow. Far from being mere rehashes of old datasets, evidence shows that studies based on analyses of previously published data can achieve just as much impact as original projects.
The multidisciplinary conferences that use ‘science’ as an adjective can be a fantastic source of new collaborations and ideas.
The scientific community must take measures to keep preprints from distorting the public’s understanding of science, says Tom Sheldon.
Data on the career paths of young researchers would help to guide the lost generation.
Negotiations with Elsevier have stalled over Open Access deals.
Anonymous survey of young scientists reveals fresh accusations of bullying and harassment at astrophysics institute.
A pilot experiment has seen 26 papers published under open-access terms so far and should yield a report by the end of the year.
Machine learning on mountain of safety data improves automated assessments.