Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

How Blood from Coronavirus Survivors Might Save Lives

How Blood from Coronavirus Survivors Might Save Lives

New York City researchers hope antibody-rich plasma can keep people out of intensive care.

What's Wrong with the H-Index, According to Its Inventor

What's Wrong with the H-Index, According to Its Inventor

Love it or hate it, the H-index has become one of the most widely used metrics in academia for measuring the productivity and impact of researchers. But when Jorge Hirsch proposed it as an objective measure of scientific achievement in 2005, he didn’t think it would be used outside theoretical physics.

Coronavirus Crisis Hits Ice-locked Arctic Research Expedition

Coronavirus Crisis Hits Ice-locked Arctic Research Expedition

A team member on the huge project has tested positive for the virus, delaying the air mission.

The Busy Lives of Academics Have Hidden Costs - and Universities Must Take Better Care of Their Faculty Members

The Busy Lives of Academics Have Hidden Costs - and Universities Must Take Better Care of Their Faculty Members

Hilal A. Lashuel's experiences have taught him that maintaining good mental health and balancing life and work is a struggle everywhere in academia.

Open Peer-Review Platform for COVID-19 Preprints

Open Peer-Review Platform for COVID-19 Preprints

The public call for rapid sharing of research data relevant to the COVID-19 outbreak is driving an unprecedented surge in (unrefereed) preprints. To help pinpoint the most important research, Nature launched Outbreak Science Rapid PREreview, an open-source platform for rapid review of preprints related to emerging outbreaks.

"TOP Factor" Rates Journals on Transparency, Openness

"TOP Factor" Rates Journals on Transparency, Openness

A new tool, created by the advocacy organization Center for Open Science, seeks to change editorial practices. Journals are scored based on ten different criteria, including availability of data and policies on preregistration.

Comparing Meta-analyses and Preregistered Multiple-laboratory Replication Projects

Comparing Meta-analyses and Preregistered Multiple-laboratory Replication Projects

Kvarven, Strømland and Johannesson compare meta-analyses to multiple-laboratory replication projects and find that meta-analyses overestimate effect sizes by a factor of almost three. Commonly used methods of adjusting for publication bias do not substantively improve results.