web articles

Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Gender Equality Figures Promising but Not the Full Story

Gender Equality Figures Promising but Not the Full Story

Relying just on numbers to assess gender equality is insufficient because companies and researchers are smart enough to game the system.

Understanding Collaborative Tools

Understanding Collaborative Tools

In this interview, we have a discussion with the co-founder of PaperHive, Alexander Naydenov about the impact PaperHive has had on ESL authors.

Why We Need Centralized Services

Why We Need Centralized Services

While preprints have been around since before arXiv.org launched in 1991, fields outside of physics are starting to push for more early sharing of research data, results and conclusions.

Defining Open Peer Review

Defining Open Peer Review

Recently, our colleagues at OpenAIRE have published a systematic review of ‘Open Peer Review’ (OPR). As part of this, they defined seven consistent traits of OPR, which we thought sounded like a remarkably good opportunity to help clarify how peer review works at ScienceOpen. At ScienceOpen, we have over 31 million article records all available for …

Why Has Submitting a Manuscript to a Journal Become So Difficult?

Why Has Submitting a Manuscript to a Journal Become So Difficult?

A call to simplify an overly complicated process

Too Much Talk, Too Little Action

Too Much Talk, Too Little Action

Starting this year, I will stop traveling to any speaking engagements on open science (or, more generally, infrastructure reform), as long as these events do not entail a clear goal for action.

Wellcome Open Research Author Survey Results

Wellcome Open Research Author Survey Results

Author survey shows that publication speed and the ability to share a variety of research outputs are the primary reasons why authors publish on the Wellcome Open Research publishing platform.

When Is Enough Enough?

When Is Enough Enough?

In recent years, librarians have become very concerned about so-called predatory practices associated with some open access publishers. These practices, while concerning, are no where near as harmful to the academic mission as are the practices at Elsevier. We are like that metaphorical frog being slowly boiled.

The Preprint Citation Bump

The Preprint Citation Bump

Implications for researchers preprinting their work in terms of precedence, visibility and citation impact, and manuscript editing. Researchers that preprint their work have a citation boost ranging from 83% to 269%.

The History of Peer Review

The History of Peer Review

The report from SpotOn, 'What might peer review look like in 2030?' has now been published. This blog contains a section on the history of peer review from Frank Norman. Read the full report from SpotOn 2016 here.

New NIH Approach to Grant Funding Aimed at Optimizing Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars

New NIH Approach to Grant Funding Aimed at Optimizing Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars

NIH puts forward a new approach to make sure that it is exercising optimum stewardship of the funds.

These Countries Could Be the World's New Education Superstars

These Countries Could Be the World's New Education Superstars

From Turkey to Thailand, some countries punch above their weight when it comes to university access and research. And where education takes root, economic growth soon follows, says Chris Parr of Times Higher Education.

Authors Can Now Directly Submit to PeerJ from bioRxiv

Authors Can Now Directly Submit to PeerJ from bioRxiv

Preprints are receiving welcome attention these days for being an integral part of research communication. We announce that starting this week researchers will be able to directly submit their manuscripts to PeerJ for peer review from the popular preprint server bioRxiv.