Summary of the results of the 2018 ORCID members survey.

ReimagineReview records trials that are probing the pros and cons of different approaches to review.

As departure day approaches, chief of top UK lab says he fears science will drop off the government's agenda.

Six male researchers describe their efforts to support their female colleagues.

The hunt for male and female distinctions inside the skull is a lesson in bad research practice.

How common are calculation errors in the scientific literature? And can they be caught by an algorithm?

This webinar is brought to you by the Science/AAAS Custom Publishing Office

Although researchers do leave newer member states to pursue their career goals, especially in the early stages of their career, they almost always never want to return to their home countries.

Academic hiring and promotion committees and funding bodies often use publication lists as a shortcut to assessing the quality of applications. In order to avoid bias towards prestigious titles, plain language statements should become a standard feature of academic assessment.

Australian chief scientist Alan Finkel calls for formal action to bake in better research practices.

Ask for Evidence is a public campaign that holds powerful figures, companies, organisations and public bodies to account. It helps people challenge claims in news stories, adverts and policies and ask for the evidence behind them. It’s making sure a discussion on the evidence happens when it really matters. Becoming an ambassador is an opportunity to encourage others in your region to Ask for Evidence by giving talks, running activities and talking with community groups about issues that matter to them.  

There has been a fair amount of reactions to the changes being made to Wellcome's open access policy to ensure that no research is behind a paywall. This is how Wellcome are working to address them.

Computer programming once had much better gender balance than it does today. What went wrong?

Fewer than 1 percent of doctorates in math are awarded to African-Americans. Edray Goins, who earned one of them, found the upper reaches of the math world a challenging place.

Invited talk by Jon Tennant delivered at the NFAIS 2019 Annual Conference.

Advance knowledge in service of equitable and open scholarship is the mission of the Center for Research on Equitable and Open Scholarship. CREOS seeks evidence about the best ways disparate communities can participate in scholarship with minimal bias or barriers. 

Current efforts to make research more accessible and transparent can reinforce inequality within STEM professions.

February 11 was the International Day of Women and Girls in Science. This year, it was marked by a joint statement celebrating women’s achievements in science from Europe’s eight EIROforum laboratories.

The social-media platform is often a tool for procrastination, says Jet-Sing M. Lee. But what else can it be?

  This article by Dr Hélène Draux, Research Data Scientist at Digital Science, and Dr Suze Kundu, Head of Public Engagement at Digital Science takes note of 11th February, the annual International Day of Women and Girls in Science.

With thousand of pages of feedback on the Plans S implementation guidance, what themes emerged that might guide next steps?

In a new study, researchers uncovered female programmers who made important but unrecognized contributions to genetics.

OPERAS, the European research infrastructure dedicated to open scholarly communication in the Social Sciences and Humanities, provides its recommendations to the guidance document on the implementation of Plan S.

The community-curated website aims to connect early-career researchers with funding opportunities, useful resources and each other.

Are you participating in a H2020 funded project? Would you like to know more on how to comply with the H2020 Open Access mandate? Join in this moderated FOSTER/OpenAIRE Course on Open Access to Publications in Horizon 2020.

To help us better understand and meet the needs of our current and future users, we invite you to complete this survey of what you know about ORCID, whether - and if so, how - you currently use ORCID and your experiences of doing so, what’s working and what isn’t, and more.

As a community of 140 organisations who are committed to the advancement of open access publishing and who represent the majority of the of the OA journal output in the DOAJ*, OASPA is of course very supportive of the intentions of Plan S, as we commented previously at the beginning of October.

We first announced plans to investigate identifiers for grants in 2017 and are almost ready to violate the first rule of grant identifiers which is “they probably should not be called grant identifiers”.

A US project is exploring the use of software to assign confidence levels to published research.  

Unlike most faulty research practices, fraud actively evades detection. It is also overlooked because the scientific community has been unwilling to have frank and open discussions about it.