The Open Scholarship Knowledge Base is a collaborative initiative to curate and share knowledge about the what, why, and how of open scholarship.

Campaigners have argued for open access to scientific research since the dawn of the internet - so why is it taking so long?

Childhood obesity is a major public health problem, and has been for some time - but something is missing with many study methods.

"A Frankenstein material" is teeming with - and ultimately made by - photosynthetic microbes. And it can reproduce.

Here we present an anonymized version of the dataset that we collected in the quantitative phase of Wellcome's research on research culture. Additionally, we present a document detailing how the data was transformed to protect anonymity. We also present a flowchart that indicates how participants were guided to answer questions in the survey.

We're calling on librarians around the world to help make Wikipedia stronger than ever, in a world that needs reliable information more t…

Big data are difficult to handle. These tips and tricks can smooth the way.

Arnold's move garnered praise on Twitter and showed how scientific research needs to change.

Study suggests that 'predatory' spam targeted specifically at scholars costs universities $1.1 billion annually.

Predatory publishers' papers - long feared to contaminate the literature - may have little research impact.

As I do every year, I picked my ten favorite visualization projects. Here they are in no particular order.

The structural transition wrought by the internet continues to transform the journal-centric model of scholarly publishing into a researcher-centric model of scholarly communication. Success requires engagement with researcher identity, which is a struggle even for most of the largest publishing.

Draft guidance for Wellcome-funded organisations on how to implement the core principles of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).

Peer review can increase the chances of future collaboration, but it doesn't help much against author conflicts of interest.

The research that caught the public imagination in 2019.

Do men and women differ in how positively they frame their research findings and is the positive framing of research is associated with higher downstream citations?

An opportunity for journals and publishers to take the bold step of changing their business model?

Altmetric list of scholarship getting the most online attention shows that authenticity in science, and society more generally, is major theme of the year.

Many scientific organizations struggle with teaching and incentivizing science-communication practices. Here's what they can do differently, says communication researcher Jessica Eise.

Robert Harington explores rumors circulating in recent weeks of an impending US Executive Order focusing on public access to federally funded research and open data.

Scientists use big data to understand what separates winners from losers

Congress is set to approve a major defense bill that would establish two new high-level bodies aimed at preventing foreign governments from unfairly exploiting the U.S.

An explanation of the mandatory provision in the new Copyright Directive that ensures that faithful reproductions of public domain works of visual art cannot be subject to exclusive rights.

The first version of our metadata input schema (a DTD, to be specific) was created in 1999 to capture basic bibliographic information and facilitate matching DOIs to citations. Over the past 20 years the bibliographic metadata we collect has deepened, and we've expanded our schema to include funding information, license, updates, relations, and other metadata. Our schema isn't as venerable as a MARC record or as comprehensive as JATS, but it's served us well.

Quarterly updates on scientific integrity in the US nearly three years into the Trump administration.

Concerns about the threat from the Global North to Latin America's exemplary tradition of open access publishing are understandable but ultimately misplaced.

The report describing the creation of the world’s first gene-edited babies creates an ethical quandary for scientific journals.

What's it like to be work in scholarly communications as a person with a disability - physical or mental?

Growing evidence suggests that the evaluation of researchers’ careers on the basis of narrow definitions of excellence is restricting diversity in academia, both in the development of its labour force and its approaches to address societal challenges. Recommendations are suggested for the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions.