A new system must build cross-sector collaboration, lower barriers to working together, and create excitement and tangible know-how to attract investment.

It’s clearly not open to all if scholars are required to pay to publish their results.

SciComm: Why it is essential, and how we can do it better.

National initiatives that track people, rather than papers, will lead to better science in the United States.

Last week another nonprofit platform called ScholarlyHub announced its plans for a site where researchers can also exchange ideas and work—if they pay a subscription fee.

The importance of addressing researchers’ recognition and reward structures, arguing it is time to move to a system that uses metrics and indicators that incentivise the types of behaviours that are good for research and researchers.

Genius is a male trait, it was widely believed in the 1940s.

Trevor Mundel, President of Global Health at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, is eager to see Gates Open Research match the performance of Wellcome Open Research.

The interests of the legacy publishers cannot co-exist with the ideals of the Open Access movement.

Information manipulation is not new, yet everything is different. How do governments, preprints, algorithms, and our own responsibilities intersect? Where does peer review come in now?

How do evolving forms of digital scholarship fit into the current landscape and what are the implications for publishers?

Science could benefit from more reporting of null findings, even if the reports were briefer and had less detail than would be needed for peer review.

Recently, I have worked with a number of professional services firms committed to equality, diversity and inclusion. By Iris Bohnet.

Researchers should recognize communities that feel over-researched and under-rewarded.

Ideally, we want science and scholarship to be not only available to the general public, but also comprehensible to them. But the challenges to doing so are real, and may vary both by discipline and by study type.

Researchers who want professorships are sometimes driven to publish suspect findings.

Metrics are notoriously inappropriate for evaluating humanistic scholarship. HumetricsHSS is an initiative to embed metrics with humanistic values.

It sounds almost absurd, but that could be one factor behind the so-called “reproducibility crisis”.

Thomas Insel's biggest lesson from his shift from NIMH director to Silicon Valley entrepreneur: academic and technology company researchers should partner up.

A look at what we have published highlights the variety of editorial judgements in selecting and assessing papers.

Could postdoc unions be the next big thing in collective bargaining among academics? Recent filing at University of Washington could be beginning of a new round of organizing.

Far from being duped, researchers with few resources are turning to "predatory" journals to publish articles and polish resumes.

How is a scientific article accepted for publication in an academic journal? What is the role of peer reviewers? Where does the system go astray?

What would the world be like without formal peer review?, asks Fields medallists Timothy Gowers.

Ideas and data can interact, and our work can certainly benefit from the bad ideas that, in the short-term, do not seem to directly benefit discovery. 

Could the real open access please stand up? If more research was published according to true open access principles, we'd see better application of evidence for everyone's benefit.

Pursuing extracurricular interests shouldn't be a crime.

The scientific and religious revolutions that began 500 years ago were not causally related, but were both stimulated by printing, argues David Wootton.

Permanent jobs in academia are scarce, and someone needs to let PhD students know.

We need to be more concerned than ever about how society uses scientific discoveries, says Venki Ramakrishnan, President of the Royal Society UK.