Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Inefficient Scientific Peer Review Process Takes 4 Months on Average

Inefficient Scientific Peer Review Process Takes 4 Months on Average

Academics often complain about how long it takes for a paper to undergo peer reveiw. A publication reveals several striking observations based on these experiences.

New Study Explores Disparities Between Researchers Who Publish in High-And Low-Impact Journals

New Study Explores Disparities Between Researchers Who Publish in High-And Low-Impact Journals

The growth of open access hasn't significantly changed the publishing landscape as regards impact factor.

The value of the open science movement

The value of the open science movement

Research creates its own problems. Articles may be withdrawn because of irregularities, results can be impossible to reproduce, methods are often non-standardised, and publications may not be accessible. The search is now on for solutions.

The end of written grant applications: Let's use a formula

The end of written grant applications: Let's use a formula

Hours spent writing grant applications could be spent actually doing research with a grant-determining formula.