Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

How Many Scientific Papers Are Mentioned in Policy-Related Documents?

How Many Scientific Papers Are Mentioned in Policy-Related Documents?

An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data investigates how many papers are mentioned in policy-related documents. We find that less than 0.5% of the papers published in different subject categories are mentioned at least once in policy-related documents. Based on our results, we recommend that the analysis of (WoS) publications with at least one policy-related mention is repeated regularly (annually). Mentions in policy-related documents should not be used for impact measurement until new policy-related sites are tracked.

A New Impact Factor in the New Publication Landscape

A New Impact Factor in the New Publication Landscape

The measurement of Impact Factor – how many citations a publication or a researcher is able to attract, is one of the most controversial yet most widely used quality indicators in science.

Tool to Access Bibliometrics for Papers Associated with a Portfolio

Tool to Access Bibliometrics for Papers Associated with a Portfolio

iCite allows users ti upload the PubMed IDs of articles of interest, optionally grouping them for comparison. It then displays the number of articles, articles per year, citations per year, and Relative Citation Ratio, a field-normalized metric that shows the citation impact of one or more articles relative to the average NIH-funded paper.

Evaluating the Non-academic Impact of Academic Research

Evaluating the Non-academic Impact of Academic Research

Evaluation of academic research plays a significant role in government efforts to steer public universities. The scope of such evaluation is now being extended to include the ‘relevance’ or ‘impact’ of academic research outside the academy. We address how evaluation of non-academic research impact can promote more such impact without undermining academic freedom and research excellence.

Bibliometric Study of FWF Austrian Science Fund 2001-2010/11

Bibliometric Study of FWF Austrian Science Fund 2001-2010/11

The scientific output supported by the FWF Austrian Science Fund is analyzed on the basis of journal publications, its distribution over fields of science, and scientific cooperation, covered by the Web of Science (WoS).

I Couldn't Get Funding for My Research So I 'Sold Out'

I Couldn't Get Funding for My Research So I 'Sold Out'

Research used to be about the pursuit of knowledge, now it’s driven by impact and returns. The only way to survive is to change how we work

World Article Publishing Illustrates Regional Values

World Article Publishing Illustrates Regional Values

An interactive visualization of article publication data from the 2016 NSF Science & Engineering Report suggest discrepancies in the cultures of science around the world.

Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators

Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators

The tension between simple but invalid indicators that are widely used and more sophisticated indicators that are not used or cannot be used in evaluation practices because they are not transparent for users, cannot be calculated, or are difficult to interpret.

Canada launches review of its research enterprise

Canada launches review of its research enterprise

An expert panel will examine the impact of a decade of policies under the previous prime minister, Stephen Harper, aimed at converting university labs into tools for industrial development and commercialization.