Science papers rarely cited in negative ways
On [22]the incidence and role of negative citations in science.
Send us a link
On [22]the incidence and role of negative citations in science.
A decades-long surge in the numbers of US biomedical postdocs may finally have ended..
Graduate students dream of academia but are keeping their career options open, according to a 2015 Nature survey.
Sixty three per cent of original research articles published to date on nature.com in 2015 are open access, nearly 10,000 papers. Ten years ago, NPG introduced its first fully open access journal. Today, NPG publishes over 80 journals with an open access option.
Many scientists still not bothering to address an issue that undermines the reproducibility of research findings.
Scientists should consider engaging more with the DIYbio community.
Crowdsourcing research can balance discussions, validate findings and better inform policy.
Humans are remarkably good at self-deception. But growing concern about reproducibility is driving many researchers to seek ways to fight their own worst instincts.
Too many university posts are given to men without proper competition.
Report warns that growing government regulations detracts from research.
Turn the fraught flirtation between the social and biophysical sciences into fruitful partnerships with five principles.
An analysis reveals the extent and impact of research that bridges disciplines.
For the benefits of digital medicine to be fully realized, we need not only to find a shared home for personal health data but also to give individuals the right to own them.
Long-awaited revision proposed for regulations governing studies of human subjects.
Report praises US$5-billion scheme for making leading universities more competitive - but some smaller institutions have done just as well.
UK data hold lessons for how to close the gender gap in bioscience grant applications, success and size, argue Paul Boyle and colleagues.
Tie funding to verified good institutional practice, and robust science will shoot up the agenda.
The creators of PubPeer dropped their own anonymity today, as part of an announcement about a new chapter in the life of the post-publication peer review site..
Amateurs are ready and able to try the CRISPR technique for rewriting genes.
Intriguing correlation mined from 140,000 papers.
From the oceans to the soil, technology is changing the part that amateurs can play in research. But this greater involvement raises concerns that must be addressed.
US judges dismiss injunctions against journals.
Alert your followers on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and other social networking sites by announcing your published work along with a link to your article. To encourage sharing - use hashtags relevant to your subject and tag co-authors or department colleagues who may also want to share your paper. Looking for more ideas?
The involvement of online discussion sites in the identification of errors, anomalies and worse in the published literature continues to demonstrate the usefulness of post-publication review. It also highlights the ambiguous power of anonymity.
The European Commission has abandoned consideration of 'Science 2.0', finding it too ambitious.
Results from a survey on perceptions of data sharing, discovery, and metrics.
[3]Opinion piece that calls for bioethics to ‘get out of the way’ prompts self-reflection among ethicists.
Scientists on social media debate a call to require PhD students to replicate research before they can graduate.
Active problem-solving confers a deeper understanding of science than does a standard lecture. But some university lecturers are reluctant to change tack.