Reviewer Bias in Single- Versus Double-Blind Peer Review
Single-blind reviewing confers a significant advantage to papers with famous authors and authors from high-prestige institutions.
publications
Send us a link
Single-blind reviewing confers a significant advantage to papers with famous authors and authors from high-prestige institutions.
A clear citation advantage for open publishing with open available documents receiving twice as many citations.
The world’s most important research is inaccessible from the majority of the world.
Investigating the implementation of data management and sharing requirements within development research projects.
A set of scenarios produced by the School of International Futures, published here as a tool for others to use in exploring alternative futures for UK research and innovation.
An easy to apply, universally comparable and fair metric to measure and report co-authors contribution in the scientific literature.
Study finds male Ph.D. candidates submit and publish papers at significantly higher rates than their female peers, even within the same institution. The majors drivers of that gap remain unclear, but one factor is that women teach more during their Ph.D. programs and men serve more often as research assistants.
How does open access affect the usage of scholarly books? A white paper by Springer Nature.
While part of the original motivation of the first research publication in serial form — the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1665 — was to make money, the early history of scholarly publishing is largely one of community subsidy to cover losses or breaking even.
Considerations of open access models that can work across disciplines. The case of ELife, PLoS, and BioOne.
Emerging models of peer review from a range of disciplines and venues, and to ask how they might address some of the issues with our current systems of peer review.
Approximately half of the editors of 52 prestigious U.S. medical journals received payments from the pharmaceutical and medical device industry in 2014.
A survey of researchers at the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital provides insights into the challenges and opportunities involved in adopting an open science policy across an entire patient-oriented academic institution.
Study suggests women with male partners face bias in searches for junior faculty members.
Psychologists are pessimistic about the state of their field but want to improve, a survey shows. But are new measures working?
Open-access publishing held to the same standards as paid subscription journals.
Investigating the implementation of data management and sharing requirements within seven development research projects.
This Perspective article argues that universities should take action to support open scholarship that benefits society and to return to their core missions of knowledge dissemination, community engagement, and public good.
Figshare's annual report shows that open data has become more embedded in the research community: 82% of survey respondents are aware of open data sets and more researchers are curating their data for sharing.
Artificial-intelligence program AlphaGo Zero trained in just days, without any human input.
Accounting for audience gender ratio, men asked 1.8 questions for each question asked by a woman.
80% of faculty exhibit a rich diversity of productivity patterns.
An open document that tries to provide a concise analysis of where the global Open Science movement currently stands.
In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers are on arXiv.