Leaving the EU would drive away talented foreign scientists
A Brexit would put the UK’s academic success at risk as European research stars go elsewhere.
Send us a link
A Brexit would put the UK’s academic success at risk as European research stars go elsewhere.
"If we’re going to rely on science as a means for reaching the truth — and it’s still the best tool we have — it’s important that we understand and respect just how difficult it is to get a rigorous result."
What recent research says about fraud, errors, and other dismaying academic problems.
From the oceans to the soil, technology is changing the part that amateurs can play in research. But this greater involvement raises concerns that must be addressed.
Institutions and funders should be alert to unfeasibly prolific authors when measuring and creating incentives for researcher productivity.
Paper showing that increasing research investments, resulting in an increasing knowledge base, have not yielded comparative gains in certain health outcomes over the last five decades. [Closed Access]
Interdisciplinarity is often framed as an unquestioned good within and beyond the academy, one to be encouraged by funders and research institutions alike. And yet there is little research on how interdisciplinary projects actually work—and do not work—in practice.
This paper asks the question: do people with different levels of research productivity and identification as a researcher think of research differently?
Alert your followers on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and other social networking sites by announcing your published work along with a link to your article. To encourage sharing - use hashtags relevant to your subject and tag co-authors or department colleagues who may also want to share your paper. Looking for more ideas?
Modern science is becoming larger-scale and more collaborative.
The European Commission has abandoned consideration of 'Science 2.0', finding it too ambitious.
[5]Frontiers dismisses 31 of its editors, based on escalated opposition to the publisher’s unique publication model.
[8]Editas, a company started by several gene-editing pioneers, gets new funding to develop treatments for blood cancers, eye diseases, and sickle-cell anemia.
Positive results are exciting, but the interest in positive results is skewing what we know about science.
"Making non-attachment a central part of science education would beat the hell out of ethics classes and regulations about the use of Photoshop in preparing figures."
Peer review may not spot fraud – so universities need to be vigilant in tackling any wrongdoing among their staff.
Today’s patent regime operates in the name of progress. Instead, it sets innovation back. Time to fix it.
The involvement of online discussion sites in the identification of errors, anomalies and worse in the published literature continues to demonstrate the usefulness of post-publication review. It also highlights the ambiguous power of anonymity.
[21]New analysis of interdisciplinary collaboration across the UK research landscape highlights important questions about how we organise, fund and assess research.
Science hackathons can help academics, particularly those in the early stage of their careers, to build collaborations and write research proposals.
In the quest for the research money it is more important how researchers build their collaboration network than what publications they produce and whether they are cited.
Facebook likes only predict citations in the psychological area but not in the non-psychological area of business or in the field of life sciences.
Laureates produce fewer papers but with higher average citations, more sole-authored papers both before and after winning the Prize, and have a lower number of coauthors across their entire careers than the matched group.
Results from a survey on perceptions of data sharing, discovery, and metrics.
Innovation almost always requires long periods of quite traditional training.
For-profit company Elsevier explains Open Science.
[3]Opinion piece that calls for bioethics to ‘get out of the way’ prompts self-reflection among ethicists.
Times Higher Education analysis reveals the institutions with the most Nobel prizewinners this century.
A Russian computer scientist was fired from his job at a university in the Netherlands last year after Dutch intelligence officers warned he was spying for his home country.