Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing

Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing

Our organisations have collaborated to identify principles of transparency and best practice for scholarly publications and to clarify that these principles form the basis of the criteria by which suitability for membership is assessed.

Should we Steer Clear of the Winner-Takes-All Approach?

Should we Steer Clear of the Winner-Takes-All Approach?

Scientists in New Zealand held the first ‘Kindness in Science’ workshop in December 2017 at the University of Auckland, hoping to kick-start a movement that will offer a kinder, gentler and more inclusive scientific culture. The group’s mantra is “Everyone here is smart and kind — don’t distinguish yourself by being otherwise.”

Why Academic Journals Need to Go

Why Academic Journals Need to Go

In his fantastic Peters Memorial Lecture on occasion of receiving CNI’s Paul Evan Peters award, Herbert Van de Sompel of Los Alamos National Laboratory described my calls to drop subscription.

UCL Launches Open Access Megajournal

UCL Launches Open Access Megajournal

UCL Press is launching a new open access megajournal that will provide academics and students with ground-breaking research free of charge in a move that challenges traditional commercial publishing models.

Laws Are Not the Only Way to Boost Immunization

Laws Are Not the Only Way to Boost Immunization

The French government must mitigate the risks in its legal imposition of vaccinations by promoting more coherent and proactive vaccine policies.

China Needs to Listen to its Researchers to Become a Scientific Superpower

China Needs to Listen to its Researchers to Become a Scientific Superpower

The country’s research could soon dominate the world stage, but pitfalls lie in wait.

The Peer Review Process for Awarding Funds to International Science Research Consortia: a Qualitative Developmental Evaluation

The Peer Review Process for Awarding Funds to International Science Research Consortia: a Qualitative Developmental Evaluation

This article describes the use of qualitative research to explore the peer review process used for awarding grants to ten multi-national natural science research consortia

How Citizen Science Changes the World

How Citizen Science Changes the World

The NSF encourages people to help build a better, more informed society by participating in Citizen Science, or Public Participation in Scientific Research in a program designed to engage the public in addressing societal needs and accelerating science, technology, and innovation.

To Have and Have Not: The Drama of EU Research Funding Enters Its next Act

To Have and Have Not: The Drama of EU Research Funding Enters Its next Act

More EU ministers and commissioners are voicing support for bigger research and innovation funding - but the political argument is a long way from won. To win the case for more funding, innovation fans are going to have to talk, not abstractly, but concretely.​

Nobel Laureates and the Economic Impact of Research: A Case Study

Nobel Laureates and the Economic Impact of Research: A Case Study

We ran data on the scientific publications of 37 laureates of the Nobel prizes in Medicine, Physics and Chemistry. The results showed that those laureates have produced knowledge that has been taken up in innovation more widely than the work of the average US or world scientist.

Could Science Destroy the World? These Scholars Want to Save Us from a Modern-Day Frankenstein

Could Science Destroy the World? These Scholars Want to Save Us from a Modern-Day Frankenstein

A small group of researchers is studying how science could destroy the world - and how to stop that from happening.

Open Access Levels: A Quantitative Exploration Using Web of Science and oaDOI Data

Open Access Levels: A Quantitative Exploration Using Web of Science and oaDOI Data

Using newly available open access status data, year-on-year open access levels are explored across research fields, languages, countries, institutions, funders and topics, and the resulting patterns are related to disciplinary, national and institutional contexts.

Modelling Science Trustworthiness Under Publish or Perish Pressure

Modelling Science Trustworthiness Under Publish or Perish Pressure

Analysis suggesting that trustworthiness of published science in a given field is influenced by false positive rate, and pressures for positive results. We find decreasing available funding has negative consequences for resulting trustworthiness, and examine strategies to combat propagation of irreproducible science.

When Evaluating Research, Different Metrics Tell Us Different Things

When Evaluating Research, Different Metrics Tell Us Different Things

Metrics from different sources are compared in two studies published as preprints. The research indicated that altmetrics, as currently framed, are significantly weaker indicators of research quality - as measured by expert peers’ assessments - than traditional metrics.

What Makes Academic Careers Less Insecure? The Role of Individual-Level Antecedents

What Makes Academic Careers Less Insecure? The Role of Individual-Level Antecedents

Paper advising universities to provide early-career researchers with temporal space for research and networking, facilitate stays at other universities, inform them about career success factors, and tailor faculty development programmes to the distinct stages of academic careers.

Rising Star Appointed UK Science Minister

Rising Star Appointed UK Science Minister

The UK has gained a new science minister as part of a broader reshuffle of government posts. Sam Gyimah, who moves from the Ministry of Justice, was appointed minister for universities and science on 9 January, replacing Jo Johnson.